A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan

case legislation Case regulation is law that is based on judicial decisions somewhat than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case regulation concerns one of a kind disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case law, also used interchangeably with common regulation , refers to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or matter.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally recognized conviction. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot attain out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the lessen courts.

PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's hassle-free to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has arrived at to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's reached these kinds of stage. Read more

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) lotus case in international law Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well-settled that whilst looking at the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the benefit of each of the qualified candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates that are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part with the respondent department.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is really a mandatory need along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law calls for that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed on the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.

Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this kind of legislation strives to shape our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there can be one particular or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.